The reason an unpronounceable name loses word of mouth
A name that is hard to say is harder to recommend, and difficulty of pronunciation is read as risk rather than as unfamiliarity.
Filed by The Archivist 2 min read
Intuition test — answer before you read on
Food additives were described with easy or hard-to-pronounce invented names. How were they rated?
Correct answer: B
Harder names were rated as riskier. Fluency is experienced as a feeling about the object rather than about the act of reading, so the effort of decoding a word gets filed as evidence about the thing the word names.
A product with an awkward name loses the one channel it cannot buy. Recommendation happens aloud, and a speaker unsure of a word will describe the product instead of naming it — or will name a competitor whose name they can pronounce without risking a small public embarrassment.
What everyone sees
Pronunciation is treated as a temporary problem. Any name becomes familiar with exposure, so an unusual spelling is regarded as a distinctive asset that costs a little at launch and repays it later in memorability, which is why founders defend it.
What is actually happening
Processing fluency leaks into judgement. Material that is difficult to process is rated as riskier, less familiar and less liked, and the effect has been shown for food additives given hard-to-pronounce invented names and for people with hard-to-pronounce surnames, who are rated less favourably in evaluation tasks. The difficulty is attributed to the object rather than to the reader.
Why it stays hidden
The cost is paid in conversations the company never observes. A recommendation that did not happen leaves no data, so the loss appears in no dashboard, while the launch metrics that do appear come from written impressions where pronunciation is never tested. The name therefore looks fine for exactly as long as nobody has to say it aloud.
Difficulty of processing is misread as a property of the thing being processed.
Difficulty of processing is misread as a property of the thing being processed.
Collect this card
Difficulty of processing is misread as a property of the thing being processed.
0 / 10,000 collected
Sources & further reading 3
- Song & Schwarz, "If It’s Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky", Psychological Science, 2009
- Laham, Koval & Alter, "The Name-Pronunciation Effect", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012
- Lowrey & Shrum, "Phonetic Symbolism and Brand Name Preference", Journal of Consumer Research, 2007
Cross-references
Related files
Filed near this one in the index.
-
No visual on fileNaming & Sound Entry #0556
The reason a name that describes limits growth
A name that explains itself also defines a boundary. The second product arrives under a nameplate saying it does not exist.
AdeptThe hidden part #0556A descriptive name is a loan against the first category. It is repaid when the second one arrives.
Naming Open file -
No visual on fileNaming & Sound Entry #0552
The reason short names dominate expensive categories
Luxury brands tend toward monosyllables and clipped forms. The compression is not accidental: brevity reads as confidence, and confidence reads as authority.
AdeptThe hidden part #0552Compression implies confidence. The name that needs no explanation has already claimed the authority that longer names are still arguing for.
Naming Open file -
No visual on fileNaming & Sound Entry #0557
Why acronyms lose meaning and gain durability
Nobody can expand the three letters, and several of the words they once stood for name a business the firm no longer conducts.
NoviceThe hidden part #0557An opaque name cannot go out of date, because it never said anything a business could outgrow.
Naming Open file -
No visual on filePersuasion Systems Entry #0259
Why repetition without new evidence changes minds
The argument has not been updated. It has been repeated. Each repetition adds no information and adds familiarity, and familiarity is filed as agreement.
AdeptThe hidden part #0259Repetition does not add evidence. It adds ease. Ease is experienced as agreement, and the speaker needs nothing else.
Persuasion Open file
Annotations are reserved for archive members.
Sign in to annotate