Attention & Memory Entry #0183 Classified Declassified

The reason a familiar route feels shorter going home

The outward journey takes longer than the return, though the distance is the same. What changed is what the traveller expected.

No visual record attached The written record below is complete.
Plate 162 — two journeys of equal length, one of them shorter.

Intuition test — answer before you read on

The return journey feels shorter than the outward one. What is the best explanation?

The drive to an unfamiliar destination takes forty minutes. The drive home, same road, same traffic, same speed, takes thirty — or so it feels. Clocked, the two are within a minute of each other.

What everyone sees

The common explanation is familiarity: you know the road better on the way back, so it passes faster. But the effect also appears on novel return routes, which rules out landmark recognition as the main driver.

What is actually happening

Van de Ven, van Rijswijk and Roy documented the return-trip effect and showed it occurs even when the return route is different, which implicates expectation rather than familiarity. The outward trip is typically underestimated beforehand, so it feels longer than expected; the return is then overestimated, so it feels shorter than expected. Zakay and Block’s attentional-gate model describes how attention to the passage of time itself inflates duration estimates. When surprise is absent, less attention is paid to passage, and subjective duration shrinks.

Why it stays hidden

The asymmetry hides because neither leg is timed. The traveller has only their felt duration, which they treat as a measurement rather than as a comparison against a forecast. The forecast itself is invisible — nobody notices that they expected the return to take longer — so the discrepancy is attributed to the road.

The road did not change. The forecast did. Duration is the gap between what happened and what was expected.

The road did not change. The forecast did. Duration is the gap between what happened and what was expected.

The hidden part — entry #0183

Collect this card

The road did not change. The forecast did. Duration is the gap between what happened and what was expected.

0 / 10,000 collected

Sources & further reading 3
  1. van de Ven, van Rijswijk & Roy, "The Return Trip Effect", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2011
  2. Zakay & Block, "Temporal Cognition", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1997
  3. Roy, Christenfeld & McKenzie, "Underestimating the Duration of Future Events", Memory & Cognition, 2005

Circulate this file

Annotations are reserved for archive members.

Sign in to annotate