The reason a chart starts on the day the return looked best
A performance chart begins at a chosen date, and starting on the low point makes every later value an impressive gain, turning selection of the axis into the story.
Filed by The Archivist 2 min read
Intuition test — answer before you read on
Why can a rising performance chart mislead even when its data are accurate?
Correct answer: A
Option B invents a recency exaggeration rule. Option C denies that selection can distort true data. Option A identifies start-date selection: a trough baseline manufacturing an impressive gain from unchanged behaviour.
A protocol showed a chart of its token climbing steeply, proof of strong returns. The chart began on a specific date — the exact local bottom after a crash. Measured from that trough, everything after looked like relentless growth. Started three months earlier, the same chart would have shown a collapse followed by a partial recovery. The trajectory had not changed; only the chosen origin had. The impressive return was manufactured by where the axis began, not by what the asset did.
What everyone sees
A depositor sees a chart rising from left to right and reads consistent strength: the line goes up, so the asset performs. The visual is persuasive and immediate. The depositor accepts the start date as neutral, not realising it was selected, and reads a story of growth that is really a story about which day was chosen to be day one.
What is actually happening
Research on the misuse of statistics documents start-date selection as a classic distortion: performance is acutely sensitive to the chosen baseline, and beginning at a trough maximises the apparent gain. The same series can show triumph or disaster depending only on the origin. A chart without a justified, representative start date measures the presenter’s choice of axis as much as the asset’s behaviour.
Why it stays hidden
The hidden mechanism is baseline selection masquerading as neutral history. The data are real, but the start date is an argument. By anchoring the chart at the lowest point, the protocol converts a partial recovery into an unbroken ascent, and the depositor reads the axis choice as the asset’s merit. The persuasion is in the origin, hidden in plain sight at the left edge.
A chart starting at the bottom makes anything look like a rise. The start date is the argument; the line just follows it.
A chart starting at the bottom makes anything look like a rise. The start date is the argument; the line just follows it.
Collect this card
A chart starting at the bottom makes anything look like a rise. The start date is the argument; the line just follows it.
0 / 10,000 collected
Sources & further reading 2
- Huff — How to Lie with Statistics (1954)
- Aramonte, Huang & Schrimpf — DeFi Risks and the Decentralisation Illusion (BIS, 2021)
Cross-references
Related files
Filed near this one in the index.
-
No visual on fileStatistical Illusions Entry #0435
The reason a graph without zero can double an effect
Truncating the y-axis does not change the data. It changes the slope the eye sees, and the eye reads slope as magnitude before the mind reads the numbers.
MasterThe hidden part #0435A graph with correct data and a truncated axis is not lying about the numbers. It is lying about the shape.
Statistics Open file -
No visual on fileScarcity & Queues Entry #0460
The reason rationing changes what people want
A product that was adequate becomes desirable when restricted. The restriction changed the inference the buyer draws, not the product itself.
MasterThe hidden part #0460A quota does not just limit access. It changes the inference about what is being accessed. The product behind the restriction is perceived as the product that deserved the restriction.
Scarcity Open file -
Hidden Logic Entry #0010
Why “free” costs more than one cent
Dropping a price from one cent to zero does not shave one cent off the decision. It changes which part of the brain makes it.
MasterThe hidden part #0010Zero is not the smallest price. It is a different category of thing entirely.
Logic Open file -
No visual on fileRhetoric & Omission Entry #0585
The reason a statistic needs a comparison to mean anything
A number alone is a fact without a frame. The comparison supplied beside it is what gives it size, direction and significance.
MasterThe hidden part #0585A number alone is not an argument. The comparison beside it is the argument, and the person who chose the comparison chose the conclusion.
Rhetoric Open file
Annotations are reserved for archive members.
Sign in to annotate