Why the reward token drops as fast as the rewards arrive
When a reward is paid in a token that recipients immediately sell, the selling pushes its price down, so the yield erodes the value it is paid in.
Filed by The Archivist 2 min read
Intuition test — answer before you read on
Why does a high emission-funded reward token tend to lose value as fast as it is paid?
Correct answer: A
Option B invents a fixed decay rate. Option C invents a listing refusal. Option A identifies the reflexive emission-and-dump loop where selling pressure erodes the reward’s value.
A farm paid rewards in its own token at a high rate. Recipients, wanting stable value, sold the reward token as fast as they received it. That constant selling pressure pushed the token’s price steadily down, so each week’s reward was worth less than the last. The emission funding the yield was also the supply crushing the price. The higher the advertised rate, the faster the token was printed and dumped, and the faster the reward’s value decayed toward nothing.
What everyone sees
A depositor sees a high reward rate and reads high earnings, focusing on the quantity of tokens received. The rate dominates the decision. The depositor assumes each reward token holds its value, and does not connect his own intention to sell — shared by every other recipient — with the price decline that will make the next reward, and the one after, progressively worthless.
What is actually happening
Emission-funded rewards create structural sell pressure: recipients who value stability sell the reward token, and in aggregate this selling depresses the price roughly in proportion to the emission rate. Token-economics research describes this reflexive loop, where a high nominal yield accelerates the very issuance and dumping that erode the token’s value, so the real return trends toward zero even as the advertised rate stays high. The rate and the decline are two faces of the same emission.
Why it stays hidden
The hidden mechanism is the reflexive loop between yield and price. The reward’s quantity is visible and its funding source — emission — is invisible, so the depositor sees earnings without seeing the dumping that offsets them. Each recipient’s rational sale contributes to a collective decline none intends, and the higher the rate, the tighter the loop, until the yield is nominal and the value is gone.
A reward paid in a token everyone sells falls as it is paid. The higher the rate, the faster it dumps itself.
A reward paid in a token everyone sells falls as it is paid. The higher the rate, the faster it dumps itself.
Collect this card
A reward paid in a token everyone sells falls as it is paid. The higher the rate, the faster it dumps itself.
0 / 10,000 collected
Sources & further reading 2
- Soros — The Alchemy of Finance (1987)
- Cong, Li & Wang — Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation (2021)
Cross-references
Related files
Filed near this one in the index.
-
No visual on fileParadox & Proof Entry #0160
The reason a prediction can cause its own failure
The forecast changed the system it was forecasting. The prediction was accurate about the world before it was announced, and inaccurate about the world after.
MasterThe hidden part #0160A prediction that enters the system it describes is no longer a prediction. It is a participant, and participants change outcomes.
Paradox Open file -
No visual on fileStatistical Illusions Entry #0435
The reason a graph without zero can double an effect
Truncating the y-axis does not change the data. It changes the slope the eye sees, and the eye reads slope as magnitude before the mind reads the numbers.
MasterThe hidden part #0435A graph with correct data and a truncated axis is not lying about the numbers. It is lying about the shape.
Statistics Open file -
No visual on fileScarcity & Queues Entry #0460
The reason rationing changes what people want
A product that was adequate becomes desirable when restricted. The restriction changed the inference the buyer draws, not the product itself.
MasterThe hidden part #0460A quota does not just limit access. It changes the inference about what is being accessed. The product behind the restriction is perceived as the product that deserved the restriction.
Scarcity Open file -
Hidden Logic Entry #0010
Why “free” costs more than one cent
Dropping a price from one cent to zero does not shave one cent off the decision. It changes which part of the brain makes it.
MasterThe hidden part #0010Zero is not the smallest price. It is a different category of thing entirely.
Logic Open file
Annotations are reserved for archive members.
Sign in to annotate